Jurors in Hoggard trial ask questions associated to consent, assessment extra testimony

Spread the love


Jurors within the sexual assault trial of Canadian musician Jacob Hoggard requested extra questions associated to consent Sunday as deliberations continued for a sixth day.
The jury requested the decide to clarify how a complainant’s phrases and actions could possibly be used to attempt to elevate an affordable doubt about her proof associated to her frame of mind on the time of the alleged incident with out falling again on stereotypes and assumptions relating to how sexual assault victims ought to behave.It requested for examples associated to the second complainant, an Ottawa lady who met Hoggard on the relationship app Tinder in November 2016 and travelled to see him in Toronto later that month.The jury additionally requested for readability on what would symbolize real, quite than willful, ignorance of a complainant’s lack of consent.
Learn extra:

Jurors in Jacob Hoggard trial assessment testimony after telling court docket they’re deadlocked

Story continues under commercial

Hoggard, the lead singer for the band Hedley, has pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of sexual assault inflicting bodily hurt and considered one of sexual interference, a cost that refers back to the sexual touching of somebody beneath 16.The Crown alleges he groped a teenage fan after a Hedley present in April 2016, after which violently raped her in a Toronto-area lodge that September, after she turned 16.Prosecutors allege he additionally violently raped a younger Ottawa lady in late November 2016 in a downtown Toronto lodge.Each complainants testified they cried and stated no all through the encounters, and have been left bleeding and bruised afterwards.

Trending Tales

The Queen’s favorite horse was Canadian. Right here’s why the ‘particular’ bond endures

‘We’re completely destroyed’: Well being employees going through burnout, at the same time as COVID ranges ease

The defence argues the groping didn’t occur and the sexual encounters have been consensual.Hoggard testified throughout trial that whereas he doesn’t have an in depth reminiscence of the encounters, he’s assured the complainants consented primarily based on their verbal and non-verbal cues.In her solutions to jurors Sunday, Ontario Superior Court docket Justice Gillian Roberts stated she couldn’t present particular examples on how one can assess the second complainant’s proof for worry of interfering with their fact-finding course of, however may remind them of some normal “authorized propositions” on the difficulty.
Learn extra:

Jurors in Hoggard trial to assessment extra testimony after saying they’re deadlocked

Story continues under commercial

Roberts first repeated her directions to not make assumptions primarily based on stereotypes about how an “excellent sufferer” ought to act.“It’s not an error to reach at a factual conclusion that will logically mirror a stereotype if the factual conclusion just isn’t drawn from a stereotypical inference however as an alternative relies on the proof,” she stated.She additionally stated jurors may take a look at what the complainant stated and did on the time and ask themselves whether it is potential to attract a “cheap inference that she did consent.”“Do not forget that an affordable doubt should not be speculative. There have to be one thing the complainant did or stated from which an affordable doubt about consent could also be drawn,” she stated.As for the query of real or willful ignorance of lack of consent, Roberts instructed jurors it doesn’t apply.
Learn extra:

Hedley singer Jacob Hoggard going through new sexual assault cost

It’s agreed that the difficulty in every case is whether or not the Crown has confirmed past an affordable doubt that the complainant didn’t consent to the sexual exercise, she stated.If jurors settle for the complainants’ proof about what occurred within the lodge room, which means they’ve rejected Hoggard’s proof and settle for he knew the complainants weren’t consenting, the decide stated. Story continues under commercial

During the last two days, the jury has requested the court docket to replay the majority of the proof given by the 2 complainants and by Hoggard.That’s after jurors twice indicated they have been deadlocked on “some” of the counts.

© 2022 The Canadian Press

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.